" PARIS - A man convicted of raping his daughter to 12 years imprisonment in 2001 was denied Monday for a retrial, although his alleged victim had lied and told to be declared medically virgin. "The victim is still a victim "presumed", as the author "presumed" the offense has been convicted, and is therefore deemed to be guilty? Cosmic stupidity of "justice".
" The board of review of criminal convictions judge that the withdrawal of Virginia Madeira, now aged 23, is not probative. She also believes that the expert does not establish the existence of sexual abuse. "
We can not conclude on the existence or not of sexual abuse, so we refuse the withdrawal of the" victim ". This is probably the judicial principle of" benefit of the doubt that benefit the accused. "The accused took advantage: 6 years in jail.
" These two points do not constitute "a new element to cast doubt on the guilt of the condemned "concludes the commission in its decision.
Review of a final criminal conviction was handed down six times in France, the last date for the benefit of Patrick Dils. Sentenced to life imprisonment in 1989 for a double murder, he was retried and acquitted in 2002.
Antonio Madeira, a building contractor for 55 years, was arrested in 1999 after reporting her daughter, then aged 14, before a classmate. She said she had been the victim of repeated sexual abuse from her father. Virginia Madeira in 2006 published a book entitled "I lied" when she said to have locked up in a lie.
His father, who was granted parole after six years in prison, had asked the Committee, placed before the Court of Cassation, to obtain a new trial and a form of "rehabilitation" of justice.
Judges reject it, even if they sought medical expertise at their cons-survey concludes that the young woman's hymen is still intact.
These studies do not rule out the existence of certain types of childhood sexual abuse of girl believe the judges, who have followed the advice of the prosecutor general.
They say, moreover, that the examination of the record supports the conclusion that she was aware from the beginning of the implication of his statements, it showed the fear in 1999 and 2000 when his father was left or released. "
He apparently escaped the magistrates that" the victim "was afraid that very little to do with the guilt of the" author. "Whoever shed innocent in prison for 6 years was scared of it when it comes out. Let's make a slight comparison In 1945, the Nazis fled Petoche the idea of being caught up by the Soviets. This makes it one of the charming little victim Heydrich?
" The judges emphasized that until his book, she has constantly reiterated his accusations of incest before the judge for children, educators or carers. ( source)
"Author" denies, "the victim" deny, deny everyone, judges do not care in jail: the splendor of "justice." The word of the victim is sacred as it is accusatory, if by chance it is no longer, then it loses all credibility the eyes of judges.
Justice manufactures "violated" against their will: that it violates both the victim and both guilty (for the beautiful execution of the prison).
0 comments:
Post a Comment