Enjoy, ladies and gentlemen, French Justice. Look up there at a respectable distance, though. Small punitive and vengeful prosecutors may detain you quickly.
In the case now for ultra-Jean-Marc Rouillan, debility delusional institution has emerged with the speed and ostentation of a blast "terrorist."
Everyone knows, JMR has no right to talk about cases that led him to spend more than twenty rods in jail. Accordingly, when the journalist asked a question on this point, he says, literally: " I'm not allowed to speak on it ... But the fact that I am speaking is not an answer. For it is obvious that if I spit on everything we had, I could express myself. But this obligation of silence, it also prevents our experience to make his real critical assessment. "
translation for use by journalists, masked avengers and Judge enforcement of sentences that contained in solitary Rouillan:
- I'm not allowed to speak on it = I do not speak .
- But the fact that I am not speaking is a response = it is not expressed, and this non-expression, silence, has meaning. But it 'is a non-expression .
- If I spit on AD, I could express myself = "if" introduces a conditional here. This means that JMR explores a hypothetical possibility without the match to "his" truth .
- is impossible to draw a real critical assessment of AD = I have definitely not allowed to talk .
In total, therefore, Rouillan not speak, he speaks NEVER business on which he has an obligation to remain silent, namely the murder of Besse and General, or attacks of various AD.
Also, temporary suspension of his parole in no case be justify the transgression of this obligation of silence. We're in the presence of a justice that goes beyond the law and clearly demonstrated that severity as neurotic and stupid.
We understand that what the justices interfere and droitards fascists of all stripes, not that JMR has referred cases of AD since he did not . What shocked the people of surly honest people is that it seems not regret his actions . That's what makes choking hatred. As such, they divert the obligation of silence, claiming that it is violated (which is objectively false) for return the unrepentant behind bars. And here comes
hence our "prosecution" in its deepest intelligence. Rue89 announcement: "The prosecution him, will argue that he not only violated the obligation incumbent upon it in silence, but by this interview, Jean-Marc Rouillan assumes the liabilities of Action Direct. see that there is an apologist of terrorism .
Stop us if you're wrong. But the "prosecution" seems to lie. Rouillan has not breached its duty of silence. He did not assume the liabilities of AD. He made no apology for terrorism. And on these three points, in clear violation of reality, the prosecutor to believe otherwise.
The Procuracy and the good people are honest in Rouillan the evil creature they want to see. In non-deforming About Rouillan, by stretching them as prisoners stretch their sheets to hang themselves in their cells, they realize their fantasy of a diabolical JMR. For these people, to the right in general, equal one day Criminal Criminal always, is well known. It's in the genes Rouillan of being a "terrorist."
they are naive, small prosecutors who have the power: they would like the prisoner who has served 20 pins without flinching "regrets his actions." Justice We would always laugh. In the twisted mind of droitards, confinement is supposed to cause amends. He will explain that, faced with a cruel criminal justice as arbitrary, few are those who regret their act. They regret having done rather nab.
Justice does not simply shut (which is torture), it also requires that we take advantage of this torture be enjoyed and we finally rejoice. She wants to punish, but also that the punishment accepts his punishment. As noted
beautifully Catherine Baker, " expected full cooperation of the prisoner. He gives full due to the institution [...] ! The offender must endorse the decision has pronounced against him in society, join it with all his goodwill . This joyful obedience may be a comedy, there is not the point, what we want to get the prisoner is that he shows he is capable as anyone to speculate on the evolution of its price . Those who refuse to cooperate will be more years in prison ( Why should we punish? ).
The prosecution, in containing Rouillan, he is right down the line: yes, you do not right to express yourself, yes we authorize you if you spit on AD. And now, your "risk" of "terrorist" will be considered seriously without laughing, without embarrassment, by men who know well that emperruqués you will never stay more than a gun in your hand to your (short) life. But we need excuses, you know.
Without fear of being too long and tiring our readers, come now, always in line with this case, if a droitard outraged that the latest statements by Jean-Marc Rouillan .
" I will not comment too much on the scandal that is the perfect good conscience of a murderer who does not regret his crimes. At most, I thought that the expression of sincere regret should be a sine qua non for get out of jail, "announces a voice firm but sincere, this man of conviction.
You think that if it were sufficient to mimic the regret out of jail, the recipe would have allowed some criminals to roam in pastoral horizons rather than die slowly. JMR And that would not have been praying for s comply therewith. it was quite capable of playing this comedy there. What if it has not done is a proof of courage and greatness rather than a "scandal".
"If Justice must learn to forgive, she can not forgive that inmates who have proven that their imprisonment had led their redemption. "
Prison and his philosophy does not expect the redemption, but punishment . The only goal is a goal of revenge. Only the most foolish of fools still believe that the prison has a positive and constructive role.
"But Rouillan has not paid his debt may not pay it. It remains a perennial killer. "
is the vision of all rights: the crime is genetic. There is no "crimes", there are criminals. Under the figure of JMR emerges the monster. Rouillan is ontologically evil. No prison sentence can not make him atone for his crimes, says the friend Romain. The Roman friend wanted him to atone for crimes he may not in any way ever expiate, if we follow his reasoning Pharaonic .
The rest of the text is in keeping. Thinking Right reached zenith levels, especially with this sentence delicious that I invite you to read carefully: "If the folder made by L'Express can help return the murderer behind bars, this is that justice. " Translation: If a Papelard presents a man in jail Justice had cleared out, it is only fair . A newspaper article determines the confinement of a man in the prisons of the Republic is the incarnation, in fact, a very beautiful justice.
Not ours, but then not at all. Ours, justice (get it over there), when there will be emptied prisons.
In the case now for ultra-Jean-Marc Rouillan, debility delusional institution has emerged with the speed and ostentation of a blast "terrorist."
Everyone knows, JMR has no right to talk about cases that led him to spend more than twenty rods in jail. Accordingly, when the journalist asked a question on this point, he says, literally: " I'm not allowed to speak on it ... But the fact that I am speaking is not an answer. For it is obvious that if I spit on everything we had, I could express myself. But this obligation of silence, it also prevents our experience to make his real critical assessment. "
translation for use by journalists, masked avengers and Judge enforcement of sentences that contained in solitary Rouillan:
- I'm not allowed to speak on it = I do not speak .
- But the fact that I am not speaking is a response = it is not expressed, and this non-expression, silence, has meaning. But it 'is a non-expression .
- If I spit on AD, I could express myself = "if" introduces a conditional here. This means that JMR explores a hypothetical possibility without the match to "his" truth .
- is impossible to draw a real critical assessment of AD = I have definitely not allowed to talk .
In total, therefore, Rouillan not speak, he speaks NEVER business on which he has an obligation to remain silent, namely the murder of Besse and General, or attacks of various AD.
Also, temporary suspension of his parole in no case be justify the transgression of this obligation of silence. We're in the presence of a justice that goes beyond the law and clearly demonstrated that severity as neurotic and stupid.
We understand that what the justices interfere and droitards fascists of all stripes, not that JMR has referred cases of AD since he did not . What shocked the people of surly honest people is that it seems not regret his actions . That's what makes choking hatred. As such, they divert the obligation of silence, claiming that it is violated (which is objectively false) for return the unrepentant behind bars. And here comes
hence our "prosecution" in its deepest intelligence. Rue89 announcement: "The prosecution him, will argue that he not only violated the obligation incumbent upon it in silence, but by this interview, Jean-Marc Rouillan assumes the liabilities of Action Direct. see that there is an apologist of terrorism .
Stop us if you're wrong. But the "prosecution" seems to lie. Rouillan has not breached its duty of silence. He did not assume the liabilities of AD. He made no apology for terrorism. And on these three points, in clear violation of reality, the prosecutor to believe otherwise.
The Procuracy and the good people are honest in Rouillan the evil creature they want to see. In non-deforming About Rouillan, by stretching them as prisoners stretch their sheets to hang themselves in their cells, they realize their fantasy of a diabolical JMR. For these people, to the right in general, equal one day Criminal Criminal always, is well known. It's in the genes Rouillan of being a "terrorist."
they are naive, small prosecutors who have the power: they would like the prisoner who has served 20 pins without flinching "regrets his actions." Justice We would always laugh. In the twisted mind of droitards, confinement is supposed to cause amends. He will explain that, faced with a cruel criminal justice as arbitrary, few are those who regret their act. They regret having done rather nab.
Justice does not simply shut (which is torture), it also requires that we take advantage of this torture be enjoyed and we finally rejoice. She wants to punish, but also that the punishment accepts his punishment. As noted
beautifully Catherine Baker, " expected full cooperation of the prisoner. He gives full due to the institution [...] ! The offender must endorse the decision has pronounced against him in society, join it with all his goodwill . This joyful obedience may be a comedy, there is not the point, what we want to get the prisoner is that he shows he is capable as anyone to speculate on the evolution of its price . Those who refuse to cooperate will be more years in prison ( Why should we punish? ).
The prosecution, in containing Rouillan, he is right down the line: yes, you do not right to express yourself, yes we authorize you if you spit on AD. And now, your "risk" of "terrorist" will be considered seriously without laughing, without embarrassment, by men who know well that emperruqués you will never stay more than a gun in your hand to your (short) life. But we need excuses, you know.
Without fear of being too long and tiring our readers, come now, always in line with this case, if a droitard outraged that the latest statements by Jean-Marc Rouillan .
" I will not comment too much on the scandal that is the perfect good conscience of a murderer who does not regret his crimes. At most, I thought that the expression of sincere regret should be a sine qua non for get out of jail, "announces a voice firm but sincere, this man of conviction.
You think that if it were sufficient to mimic the regret out of jail, the recipe would have allowed some criminals to roam in pastoral horizons rather than die slowly. JMR And that would not have been praying for s comply therewith. it was quite capable of playing this comedy there. What if it has not done is a proof of courage and greatness rather than a "scandal".
"If Justice must learn to forgive, she can not forgive that inmates who have proven that their imprisonment had led their redemption. "
Prison and his philosophy does not expect the redemption, but punishment . The only goal is a goal of revenge. Only the most foolish of fools still believe that the prison has a positive and constructive role.
"But Rouillan has not paid his debt may not pay it. It remains a perennial killer. "
is the vision of all rights: the crime is genetic. There is no "crimes", there are criminals. Under the figure of JMR emerges the monster. Rouillan is ontologically evil. No prison sentence can not make him atone for his crimes, says the friend Romain. The Roman friend wanted him to atone for crimes he may not in any way ever expiate, if we follow his reasoning Pharaonic .
The rest of the text is in keeping. Thinking Right reached zenith levels, especially with this sentence delicious that I invite you to read carefully: "If the folder made by L'Express can help return the murderer behind bars, this is that justice. " Translation: If a Papelard presents a man in jail Justice had cleared out, it is only fair . A newspaper article determines the confinement of a man in the prisons of the Republic is the incarnation, in fact, a very beautiful justice.
Not ours, but then not at all. Ours, justice (get it over there), when there will be emptied prisons.
0 comments:
Post a Comment