After the sign you've probably crossed in the subway:
Now the TV ad, soon on TF1:
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Saponaria Officinalis Hair Fall
Meet the Experts in your safety: the TV ad
After the sign you've probably crossed in the subway:
Now the TV ad, soon on TF1:
After the sign you've probably crossed in the subway:
Now the TV ad, soon on TF1:
Monday, October 20, 2008
Can I Use Orajel For A Brazilian Wax
Philippe Mayaux back at Beaubourg
Mayaux present and sign his book artist The 4th Nail , co-published 150 copies by Editions Publishing Loevenbruck Dilecta and, in booth No. 24 at Dilecta lounge ArtistBook International, Centre Georges Pompidou Forum -1, Saturday, Oct. 25, at 16h. 
Mayaux present and sign his book artist The 4th Nail , co-published 150 copies by Editions Publishing Loevenbruck Dilecta and, in booth No. 24 at Dilecta lounge ArtistBook International, Centre Georges Pompidou Forum -1, Saturday, Oct. 25, at 16h. The Story Of The Cape Cod Bracelet
Monday, October 13, 2008
Do People Still Smack Their Dogs
Prison is "an anomaly, a cancer spreading its metastases in societal organization"
On his blog safety Public , the convict Lawrence Jacqua publish a text of an impressive force in the wake of the murders and suicides that bloom in the concentration camps of the Republic (he writes his notes in his cell and that his wife Leila who is online).
Remember: at the same time, the "remarkable" and Smart Dati wants to lower the age of criminal responsibility to 12 years (is there a more relevant response to the suicides of 16-17 years in Metz and Strasbourg?).
" Prison, by its very nature deeply criminogenic, is harmful and dangerous to society as a whole because it creates and releases men and women whose trauma is so great that their metamorphosis prevents any return to social life itself" normal. "violence, relapse, depression, suicide, drug addiction, alcoholism, maladjustment, dangerousness, psychiatric disorders and so on. ... is the real baggage that carries with it all convicted at the end of a sentence. And you can imagine, with all these ingredients, the disastrous consequences and the damage it can have on the outside world. [...]
The real danger comes not only the prisoners but the prison itself! In reality it is that we should reinsert it, because it is an anomaly, a cancer spreading its metastases in societal organization!
The prison, as conceived today, is not there to rehabilitate or repair but to punish and destroy the prisoner! And if we did it not understood, it is not worth seeking an antidote to the problem. We must reform the prison system completely from top to bottom and it would require enormous resources that we have not.
The only safe solution, although it is easier to implement, is a mistake, because the more security will be increased in detention, the more violence there will be tight and she will be explosive and barbaric. It is an equation that is relentless moreover seen in glaring example of U.S. prisons such as "super max" (maximum security). In these establishments, where often no hope of release is permitted, murders between gangs among inmates are a ruthless savagery, which proves the ineffectiveness of a security system to curb prison violence, however this does that exacerbate it. (See this very informative series on the National Geographic documentary on U.S. prisons).
If you wanted to turn men into animals and predators in prison factories to repeat, we do not take it otherwise.
But while it is the solution?
Well aware that there are not any! For we know, everybody cares less about what may happen in prisons and then with any government, whatever money is going to decide once and for all to take the bull by the horns?
Yes I am very pessimistic and I think that the focus will be on the American model: construction of new high security facilities, longer sentences, real perpetuities, security detention, and an entire legal arsenal ever more absurd, ever more repressive. The prison will eventually, like everything else, becoming bisness one, and we will manage to violence as a company that manages growls, that with more and more cops, more and more victimization, more and more laws, more and more rules, more and more repression ... in any case because of the global crisis, companies, unless a sudden revolution which would save us perhaps, are becoming open-air prisons, but you do not know yet. The day you realize, well installed at the bottom of your sofa, you'll know what do the words "arbitrary", "abolition of rights," "deprivation of liberty '" Surveillance "FILING" control "because it will come slowly until one day you do your part as" a breed apart "...
You should all now, you feel concerned and worry about problems at the prison world, because let me tell you, he who has been murdered and found himself alone with a psychopath killer was jailed for a small crime road ...
Tomorrow, who knows, taking the wheel of your vehicle, you can cause a serious accident and find yourself instantly in prison this cesspit that disgusts you so much today, and at that moment that you protect the bottom of your cell opposite to the one you have so ignored? ... Nowadays nobody is immune, something worth thinking about, right? ... "
Read the full note
Remember: at the same time, the "remarkable" and Smart Dati wants to lower the age of criminal responsibility to 12 years (is there a more relevant response to the suicides of 16-17 years in Metz and Strasbourg?).
" Prison, by its very nature deeply criminogenic, is harmful and dangerous to society as a whole because it creates and releases men and women whose trauma is so great that their metamorphosis prevents any return to social life itself" normal. "violence, relapse, depression, suicide, drug addiction, alcoholism, maladjustment, dangerousness, psychiatric disorders and so on. ... is the real baggage that carries with it all convicted at the end of a sentence. And you can imagine, with all these ingredients, the disastrous consequences and the damage it can have on the outside world. [...]
The real danger comes not only the prisoners but the prison itself! In reality it is that we should reinsert it, because it is an anomaly, a cancer spreading its metastases in societal organization!
The prison, as conceived today, is not there to rehabilitate or repair but to punish and destroy the prisoner! And if we did it not understood, it is not worth seeking an antidote to the problem. We must reform the prison system completely from top to bottom and it would require enormous resources that we have not.
The only safe solution, although it is easier to implement, is a mistake, because the more security will be increased in detention, the more violence there will be tight and she will be explosive and barbaric. It is an equation that is relentless moreover seen in glaring example of U.S. prisons such as "super max" (maximum security). In these establishments, where often no hope of release is permitted, murders between gangs among inmates are a ruthless savagery, which proves the ineffectiveness of a security system to curb prison violence, however this does that exacerbate it. (See this very informative series on the National Geographic documentary on U.S. prisons).
If you wanted to turn men into animals and predators in prison factories to repeat, we do not take it otherwise.
But while it is the solution?
Well aware that there are not any! For we know, everybody cares less about what may happen in prisons and then with any government, whatever money is going to decide once and for all to take the bull by the horns?
Yes I am very pessimistic and I think that the focus will be on the American model: construction of new high security facilities, longer sentences, real perpetuities, security detention, and an entire legal arsenal ever more absurd, ever more repressive. The prison will eventually, like everything else, becoming bisness one, and we will manage to violence as a company that manages growls, that with more and more cops, more and more victimization, more and more laws, more and more rules, more and more repression ... in any case because of the global crisis, companies, unless a sudden revolution which would save us perhaps, are becoming open-air prisons, but you do not know yet. The day you realize, well installed at the bottom of your sofa, you'll know what do the words "arbitrary", "abolition of rights," "deprivation of liberty '" Surveillance "FILING" control "because it will come slowly until one day you do your part as" a breed apart "...
You should all now, you feel concerned and worry about problems at the prison world, because let me tell you, he who has been murdered and found himself alone with a psychopath killer was jailed for a small crime road ...
Tomorrow, who knows, taking the wheel of your vehicle, you can cause a serious accident and find yourself instantly in prison this cesspit that disgusts you so much today, and at that moment that you protect the bottom of your cell opposite to the one you have so ignored? ... Nowadays nobody is immune, something worth thinking about, right? ... "
Read the full note
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
Sunday, October 5, 2008
Candle Circle Of Friends
Friday, October 3, 2008
What Is The Average Americans Bmi 2010
Radio Moratín
You can listen through this link (click here ) chronicles the issuance Marshlands (Radio Campus Lille) on Art whores (Friday, September 26). A Once on the blog of the show, scroll down page on the link''The Art of whores - Critical (Nikola) "from the" Supplement ". 
You can listen through this link (click here ) chronicles the issuance Marshlands (Radio Campus Lille) on Art whores (Friday, September 26). A Once on the blog of the show, scroll down page on the link''The Art of whores - Critical (Nikola) "from the" Supplement ".
Kate´s Playground Leaked
Scoop: The Prosecution agrees with Jean-Marc Rouillan!
Enjoy, ladies and gentlemen, French Justice. Look up there at a respectable distance, though. Small punitive and vengeful prosecutors may detain you quickly.
In the case now for ultra-Jean-Marc Rouillan, debility delusional institution has emerged with the speed and ostentation of a blast "terrorist."
Everyone knows, JMR has no right to talk about cases that led him to spend more than twenty rods in jail. Accordingly, when the journalist asked a question on this point, he says, literally: " I'm not allowed to speak on it ... But the fact that I am speaking is not an answer. For it is obvious that if I spit on everything we had, I could express myself. But this obligation of silence, it also prevents our experience to make his real critical assessment. "
translation for use by journalists, masked avengers and Judge enforcement of sentences that contained in solitary Rouillan:
- I'm not allowed to speak on it = I do not speak .
- But the fact that I am not speaking is a response = it is not expressed, and this non-expression, silence, has meaning. But it 'is a non-expression .
- If I spit on AD, I could express myself = "if" introduces a conditional here. This means that JMR explores a hypothetical possibility without the match to "his" truth .
- is impossible to draw a real critical assessment of AD = I have definitely not allowed to talk .
In total, therefore, Rouillan not speak, he speaks NEVER business on which he has an obligation to remain silent, namely the murder of Besse and General, or attacks of various AD.
Also, temporary suspension of his parole in no case be justify the transgression of this obligation of silence. We're in the presence of a justice that goes beyond the law and clearly demonstrated that severity as neurotic and stupid.
We understand that what the justices interfere and droitards fascists of all stripes, not that JMR has referred cases of AD since he did not . What shocked the people of surly honest people is that it seems not regret his actions . That's what makes choking hatred. As such, they divert the obligation of silence, claiming that it is violated (which is objectively false) for return the unrepentant behind bars. And here comes
hence our "prosecution" in its deepest intelligence. Rue89 announcement: "The prosecution him, will argue that he not only violated the obligation incumbent upon it in silence, but by this interview, Jean-Marc Rouillan assumes the liabilities of Action Direct. see that there is an apologist of terrorism .
Stop us if you're wrong. But the "prosecution" seems to lie. Rouillan has not breached its duty of silence. He did not assume the liabilities of AD. He made no apology for terrorism. And on these three points, in clear violation of reality, the prosecutor to believe otherwise.
The Procuracy and the good people are honest in Rouillan the evil creature they want to see. In non-deforming About Rouillan, by stretching them as prisoners stretch their sheets to hang themselves in their cells, they realize their fantasy of a diabolical JMR. For these people, to the right in general, equal one day Criminal Criminal always, is well known. It's in the genes Rouillan of being a "terrorist."
they are naive, small prosecutors who have the power: they would like the prisoner who has served 20 pins without flinching "regrets his actions." Justice We would always laugh. In the twisted mind of droitards, confinement is supposed to cause amends. He will explain that, faced with a cruel criminal justice as arbitrary, few are those who regret their act. They regret having done rather nab.
Justice does not simply shut (which is torture), it also requires that we take advantage of this torture be enjoyed and we finally rejoice. She wants to punish, but also that the punishment accepts his punishment. As noted
beautifully Catherine Baker, " expected full cooperation of the prisoner. He gives full due to the institution [...] ! The offender must endorse the decision has pronounced against him in society, join it with all his goodwill . This joyful obedience may be a comedy, there is not the point, what we want to get the prisoner is that he shows he is capable as anyone to speculate on the evolution of its price . Those who refuse to cooperate will be more years in prison ( Why should we punish? ).
The prosecution, in containing Rouillan, he is right down the line: yes, you do not right to express yourself, yes we authorize you if you spit on AD. And now, your "risk" of "terrorist" will be considered seriously without laughing, without embarrassment, by men who know well that emperruqués you will never stay more than a gun in your hand to your (short) life. But we need excuses, you know.
Without fear of being too long and tiring our readers, come now, always in line with this case, if a droitard outraged that the latest statements by Jean-Marc Rouillan .
" I will not comment too much on the scandal that is the perfect good conscience of a murderer who does not regret his crimes. At most, I thought that the expression of sincere regret should be a sine qua non for get out of jail, "announces a voice firm but sincere, this man of conviction.
You think that if it were sufficient to mimic the regret out of jail, the recipe would have allowed some criminals to roam in pastoral horizons rather than die slowly. JMR And that would not have been praying for s comply therewith. it was quite capable of playing this comedy there. What if it has not done is a proof of courage and greatness rather than a "scandal".
"If Justice must learn to forgive, she can not forgive that inmates who have proven that their imprisonment had led their redemption. "
Prison and his philosophy does not expect the redemption, but punishment . The only goal is a goal of revenge. Only the most foolish of fools still believe that the prison has a positive and constructive role.
"But Rouillan has not paid his debt may not pay it. It remains a perennial killer. "
is the vision of all rights: the crime is genetic. There is no "crimes", there are criminals. Under the figure of JMR emerges the monster. Rouillan is ontologically evil. No prison sentence can not make him atone for his crimes, says the friend Romain. The Roman friend wanted him to atone for crimes he may not in any way ever expiate, if we follow his reasoning Pharaonic .
The rest of the text is in keeping. Thinking Right reached zenith levels, especially with this sentence delicious that I invite you to read carefully: "If the folder made by L'Express can help return the murderer behind bars, this is that justice. " Translation: If a Papelard presents a man in jail Justice had cleared out, it is only fair . A newspaper article determines the confinement of a man in the prisons of the Republic is the incarnation, in fact, a very beautiful justice.
Not ours, but then not at all. Ours, justice (get it over there), when there will be emptied prisons.
In the case now for ultra-Jean-Marc Rouillan, debility delusional institution has emerged with the speed and ostentation of a blast "terrorist."
Everyone knows, JMR has no right to talk about cases that led him to spend more than twenty rods in jail. Accordingly, when the journalist asked a question on this point, he says, literally: " I'm not allowed to speak on it ... But the fact that I am speaking is not an answer. For it is obvious that if I spit on everything we had, I could express myself. But this obligation of silence, it also prevents our experience to make his real critical assessment. "
translation for use by journalists, masked avengers and Judge enforcement of sentences that contained in solitary Rouillan:
- I'm not allowed to speak on it = I do not speak .
- But the fact that I am not speaking is a response = it is not expressed, and this non-expression, silence, has meaning. But it 'is a non-expression .
- If I spit on AD, I could express myself = "if" introduces a conditional here. This means that JMR explores a hypothetical possibility without the match to "his" truth .
- is impossible to draw a real critical assessment of AD = I have definitely not allowed to talk .
In total, therefore, Rouillan not speak, he speaks NEVER business on which he has an obligation to remain silent, namely the murder of Besse and General, or attacks of various AD.
Also, temporary suspension of his parole in no case be justify the transgression of this obligation of silence. We're in the presence of a justice that goes beyond the law and clearly demonstrated that severity as neurotic and stupid.
We understand that what the justices interfere and droitards fascists of all stripes, not that JMR has referred cases of AD since he did not . What shocked the people of surly honest people is that it seems not regret his actions . That's what makes choking hatred. As such, they divert the obligation of silence, claiming that it is violated (which is objectively false) for return the unrepentant behind bars. And here comes
hence our "prosecution" in its deepest intelligence. Rue89 announcement: "The prosecution him, will argue that he not only violated the obligation incumbent upon it in silence, but by this interview, Jean-Marc Rouillan assumes the liabilities of Action Direct. see that there is an apologist of terrorism .
Stop us if you're wrong. But the "prosecution" seems to lie. Rouillan has not breached its duty of silence. He did not assume the liabilities of AD. He made no apology for terrorism. And on these three points, in clear violation of reality, the prosecutor to believe otherwise.
The Procuracy and the good people are honest in Rouillan the evil creature they want to see. In non-deforming About Rouillan, by stretching them as prisoners stretch their sheets to hang themselves in their cells, they realize their fantasy of a diabolical JMR. For these people, to the right in general, equal one day Criminal Criminal always, is well known. It's in the genes Rouillan of being a "terrorist."
they are naive, small prosecutors who have the power: they would like the prisoner who has served 20 pins without flinching "regrets his actions." Justice We would always laugh. In the twisted mind of droitards, confinement is supposed to cause amends. He will explain that, faced with a cruel criminal justice as arbitrary, few are those who regret their act. They regret having done rather nab.
Justice does not simply shut (which is torture), it also requires that we take advantage of this torture be enjoyed and we finally rejoice. She wants to punish, but also that the punishment accepts his punishment. As noted
beautifully Catherine Baker, " expected full cooperation of the prisoner. He gives full due to the institution [...] ! The offender must endorse the decision has pronounced against him in society, join it with all his goodwill . This joyful obedience may be a comedy, there is not the point, what we want to get the prisoner is that he shows he is capable as anyone to speculate on the evolution of its price . Those who refuse to cooperate will be more years in prison ( Why should we punish? ).
The prosecution, in containing Rouillan, he is right down the line: yes, you do not right to express yourself, yes we authorize you if you spit on AD. And now, your "risk" of "terrorist" will be considered seriously without laughing, without embarrassment, by men who know well that emperruqués you will never stay more than a gun in your hand to your (short) life. But we need excuses, you know.
Without fear of being too long and tiring our readers, come now, always in line with this case, if a droitard outraged that the latest statements by Jean-Marc Rouillan .
" I will not comment too much on the scandal that is the perfect good conscience of a murderer who does not regret his crimes. At most, I thought that the expression of sincere regret should be a sine qua non for get out of jail, "announces a voice firm but sincere, this man of conviction.
You think that if it were sufficient to mimic the regret out of jail, the recipe would have allowed some criminals to roam in pastoral horizons rather than die slowly. JMR And that would not have been praying for s comply therewith. it was quite capable of playing this comedy there. What if it has not done is a proof of courage and greatness rather than a "scandal".
"If Justice must learn to forgive, she can not forgive that inmates who have proven that their imprisonment had led their redemption. "
Prison and his philosophy does not expect the redemption, but punishment . The only goal is a goal of revenge. Only the most foolish of fools still believe that the prison has a positive and constructive role.
"But Rouillan has not paid his debt may not pay it. It remains a perennial killer. "
is the vision of all rights: the crime is genetic. There is no "crimes", there are criminals. Under the figure of JMR emerges the monster. Rouillan is ontologically evil. No prison sentence can not make him atone for his crimes, says the friend Romain. The Roman friend wanted him to atone for crimes he may not in any way ever expiate, if we follow his reasoning Pharaonic .
The rest of the text is in keeping. Thinking Right reached zenith levels, especially with this sentence delicious that I invite you to read carefully: "If the folder made by L'Express can help return the murderer behind bars, this is that justice. " Translation: If a Papelard presents a man in jail Justice had cleared out, it is only fair . A newspaper article determines the confinement of a man in the prisons of the Republic is the incarnation, in fact, a very beautiful justice.
Not ours, but then not at all. Ours, justice (get it over there), when there will be emptied prisons.
Thursday, October 2, 2008
Hobo Man Toilet Paper Holder
The extreme right and Sarkozy: The World is delighted
On Lemonde.fr today publishes a portrait of Patrick Bush, Sarkozy's advisor. The journalist described him as friendly features (this is the goal of the game's "portrait"). And regardless of whether such claims membership in the far right! Raphaelle Bacqué laughed with all his teeth mutilation. It is, she says, " the right hemisphere of the President .
Bacqué laughs gaily. She has investigated a lot to write his paper. Under his pen, Bush's life is a success story, and her relationship with Sarkozy love story: "It in 2004, zapping on the TV, where he watched his political broadcasts on LCI, that Nicolas Sarkozy Bush has decided to call. The reporter quickly mark a key point, explaining: "Chirac will lose his referendum on the European Constitution." He flipping through qualitative surveys: "When Europe was not a dream incarnate, the French were European, he says. Now they have the euro at the bottom of the pocket. And they hold responsible the increase in prices. " Finally, stabbed to Sarkozy, who will not forget: "Failure to prevail in 55%. If I'm wrong, do not you invite me ever again in your office." "
For the self-proclaimed member of the West is insightful. And on the far right, the journalist tells us, we understand the common people." The real voice is in reservoir Le Pen's electorate. This is great, Bush knows it by heart. [...] "We had to get over the electorate, that is to say, the most culturally conservative, the more reticent about immigration and customs". This guy is a holy man: prophetic, insightful, racist. attributes that pay in this time of national restoration.
Raphaëlle obviously love at first sight, anyway. Philou is virile and closer to people: " Since then, he is the guardian of the line. Catholic and popular. Muslims suspicious and critical to the elite. The right hemisphere of the President . Suspicious against Muslims! In terms gallant these things are said. Distrust not exceeding, one imagines, the terminals of the Republican debate. A rational suspicion that recognizes the importance of human rights and respect knows the difference. Although zigue " in May 1981 between a journalist in the far-right weekly Minute . In 1986, he became the managing editor ." It's not because we have written hundreds of articles for Le Pen hallucinatory propaganda that automatically pays to hate Muslims! There is a balance.
Maybe some ignorant an extreme rightist advised President (and not a little, obviously, "" The president gives me a speech without limits, "says he unvarnished ). But Raphael, she knows, and we can not say that it terrifies her. A pair of balls in the delicate world of politics, it was missing.
And they dare talk about Lepenization minds? Of fascist society? The day we open the concentration camps, then we can get on our high horse.
Bacqué laughs gaily. She has investigated a lot to write his paper. Under his pen, Bush's life is a success story, and her relationship with Sarkozy love story: "It in 2004, zapping on the TV, where he watched his political broadcasts on LCI, that Nicolas Sarkozy Bush has decided to call. The reporter quickly mark a key point, explaining: "Chirac will lose his referendum on the European Constitution." He flipping through qualitative surveys: "When Europe was not a dream incarnate, the French were European, he says. Now they have the euro at the bottom of the pocket. And they hold responsible the increase in prices. " Finally, stabbed to Sarkozy, who will not forget: "Failure to prevail in 55%. If I'm wrong, do not you invite me ever again in your office." "
For the self-proclaimed member of the West is insightful. And on the far right, the journalist tells us, we understand the common people." The real voice is in reservoir Le Pen's electorate. This is great, Bush knows it by heart. [...] "We had to get over the electorate, that is to say, the most culturally conservative, the more reticent about immigration and customs". This guy is a holy man: prophetic, insightful, racist. attributes that pay in this time of national restoration.
Raphaëlle obviously love at first sight, anyway. Philou is virile and closer to people: " Since then, he is the guardian of the line. Catholic and popular. Muslims suspicious and critical to the elite. The right hemisphere of the President . Suspicious against Muslims! In terms gallant these things are said. Distrust not exceeding, one imagines, the terminals of the Republican debate. A rational suspicion that recognizes the importance of human rights and respect knows the difference. Although zigue " in May 1981 between a journalist in the far-right weekly Minute . In 1986, he became the managing editor ." It's not because we have written hundreds of articles for Le Pen hallucinatory propaganda that automatically pays to hate Muslims! There is a balance.
Maybe some ignorant an extreme rightist advised President (and not a little, obviously, "" The president gives me a speech without limits, "says he unvarnished ). But Raphael, she knows, and we can not say that it terrifies her. A pair of balls in the delicate world of politics, it was missing.
And they dare talk about Lepenization minds? Of fascist society? The day we open the concentration camps, then we can get on our high horse.
Wednesday, October 1, 2008
Spiral Stair Hand Rails
BHL is petty leaders of Liberation, Liberation loves BHL
must read criticism that is made today of the book of Houellebecq (HLB) and Bernard-Henri Levy (BHL) by right-wing daily Liberation. It is a genuine treat.
BHL is the worst writer in the history of our Nation, as evidenced by this sentence after the back cover of "Public Enemies": " I can do all the developed imaginable: I will aggravate my case bourgeois bastard who knows nothing about social issues and who is interested in the wretched of the earth to raise its advertising .
Note that this is the person himself who has to be highly bellowed " somewhat deaf to the social question " (Release 10/08/2007).
BHL, therefore, whose prose puffy kilometer is not unlike the songs of Michel Sardou text (" course as the years passed, the guns have changed hands, is this a reason to forget that one day we needed it? "), writes like shit. And stupidities notorious at that.
But it is also a member of the supervisory board of Liberation. And as such, it enjoys a critical impartial in everyday Sneak-Laurent Joffrin.
" Bernard-Henri Levy has a loud voice, rhythmic, emphatic. These are the drums of the Tribune, the plume, even when it does run confidences, "Claire begins Devarrieux, loyal poodle. We learned that Levy's father is an" unconditional support for awesome offspring. "Because you guessed that BHL was" awesome ?
size scoop neck philosopher pie: "Without going to pay in psychology, it is clear depressive tendencies of one and will splendid warrior on the other . Bernard-Henri Levy has not the poor people who take revenge, he recorded the hostility to counter them, the better to forget. It's a strategist. He loves the battlefield. With a contradiction: it does not live like a victim. It is those who protect them, who feel responsible for their fellow human beings, even to recognize the sense of adventure that drives him to the noble causes : he must "come to Sarajevo before everyone" . But he concedes the fear and even the certainty of one day being the victim of a fatal injustice. "We must pity the man injured. This hero.
Devarrieux Claire, in addition to wriggle the magnificent courage of those who entered Sarajevo in flames or to believe that between Georgia, enjoys the view from that height is the philosophy that fecal coliforms are hamburger " His" return "to Judaism and happy without religion, the Bible, Genesis, Lucretia, the Epicureans, Althusser, Foucault: a lesson in philosophy of BHL is tonic. "
Tempting, is not it? This book, in any case, is "good news " after the conclusion of our journalist friend. What the stock market recover, no doubt. This shameless analingus
member of the supervisory board of Libe information on the dignity of journos joffrinesques.
BHL is the worst writer in the history of our Nation, as evidenced by this sentence after the back cover of "Public Enemies": " I can do all the developed imaginable: I will aggravate my case bourgeois bastard who knows nothing about social issues and who is interested in the wretched of the earth to raise its advertising .
Note that this is the person himself who has to be highly bellowed " somewhat deaf to the social question " (Release 10/08/2007).
BHL, therefore, whose prose puffy kilometer is not unlike the songs of Michel Sardou text (" course as the years passed, the guns have changed hands, is this a reason to forget that one day we needed it? "), writes like shit. And stupidities notorious at that.
But it is also a member of the supervisory board of Liberation. And as such, it enjoys a critical impartial in everyday Sneak-Laurent Joffrin.
" Bernard-Henri Levy has a loud voice, rhythmic, emphatic. These are the drums of the Tribune, the plume, even when it does run confidences, "Claire begins Devarrieux, loyal poodle. We learned that Levy's father is an" unconditional support for awesome offspring. "Because you guessed that BHL was" awesome ?
size scoop neck philosopher pie: "Without going to pay in psychology, it is clear depressive tendencies of one and will splendid warrior on the other . Bernard-Henri Levy has not the poor people who take revenge, he recorded the hostility to counter them, the better to forget. It's a strategist. He loves the battlefield. With a contradiction: it does not live like a victim. It is those who protect them, who feel responsible for their fellow human beings, even to recognize the sense of adventure that drives him to the noble causes : he must "come to Sarajevo before everyone" . But he concedes the fear and even the certainty of one day being the victim of a fatal injustice. "We must pity the man injured. This hero.
Devarrieux Claire, in addition to wriggle the magnificent courage of those who entered Sarajevo in flames or to believe that between Georgia, enjoys the view from that height is the philosophy that fecal coliforms are hamburger " His" return "to Judaism and happy without religion, the Bible, Genesis, Lucretia, the Epicureans, Althusser, Foucault: a lesson in philosophy of BHL is tonic. "
Tempting, is not it? This book, in any case, is "good news " after the conclusion of our journalist friend. What the stock market recover, no doubt. This shameless analingus
member of the supervisory board of Libe information on the dignity of journos joffrinesques.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)